She stated her side of the story, which would only be compatible if there was a third person involved. In the 6th episode of Serial, Cathy, Jen’s friend, was interviewed and asked what she knew about the case. This to me is a solid statement, because it simply does not make sense to me, especially considering the fact that some of the only evidence they had was fingerprints, which do not have a time stamp on them. If neither Adnan nor Jay can identify who this “third person” is, how can they assure Cathy’s side of the story is reliable? Also, in episode 7, when Deirdre Enright was interviewed, she was baffled as to why he was arrested with such little evidence, which I too agree with.

In episode 6, Sarah reviews the case altogether, and also interviews Jen’s friend, Cathy, however, Adnan pointed out that in order for her story to be accurate, there would have to be a third person Adnan was talking to. Both she and Sarah conversed about the possibilities of Adnan being a psychopath, and attempted to resolve the likelihood of this being true.Īs of now, both my group and I are having our doubts about Adnan committing the murder. Last but not least, we met Deirdre Enright, a lawyer from the Justin Wolfe case. Cathy is Jen’s friend who has a different version of the murder, which would have to involve a third person. Nisha is Adnan’s friend who was talking to Adnan on the phone after he committed the murder. In episode six and seven, we’re introduced to various new character, including Nisha, Cathy, and Deirdre Enright.

The atlantic serial podcast episode 7